/ai-product-development

An AI feature with a typed server contract, every UI state, evals and cost controls.

Build·Input → Response·MIT
$npx skills add tushaarmehtaa/tushar-skills --skill ai-product-development -g -a claude-code -y

Then type /ai-product-development in Claude Code, or describe the task and let it pick the skill.

What you get back recorded run · 9 Oct 2026

claude · tallyroom

Using /ai-product-development
  • Key stays on the server
  • Notes are never logged
  • Model output checked first
A typed note becomes an editable draft. Nothing is added until you confirm.
Claude Code 2.1.295·2m 59s·9 files changed
  • I've added the quick-add box to the dashboard, but I couldn't test it against OpenAI. The OPENAI_API_KEY in .env.local is a placeholder (sk-test-…, 28 characters), and OpenAI rejects it with a 401 even when called directly.
  • Names are matched against the group. Anyone who isn't a member is left out and listed in a warning.
  • If the amount isn't written exactly that way in the note (for example "1.2k"), it warns you to double-check it.
  • Confirmed expenses aren't saved. The app has no database, so Add expense only adds the row to the page, and it disappears on reload. There's a TODO where the save call should go.
CaveatOpenAI returned 401 for the test key, so no real model call succeeded; checks ran on a local stub.

Input → output from the run

app/dashboard/page.jsx before
export default function Dashboard() {
  const total = expenses.reduce((s, e) => s + e.amount, 0);
  return (
    <main className="page">
      <h1>Flat 4B — Indiranagar</h1>
lib/ai/quickAdd.js (new)
export function toDraft(raw, { text, members, currentMember, today }) {
  const warnings = [];

  let amount = typeof raw.amount === "number" && Number.isFinite(raw.amount) ? Math.round(raw.amount * 100) / 100 : null;
  if (amount !== null && (amount <= 0 || amount > MAX_AMOUNT)) amount = null;
  if (amount === null) warnings.push("Couldn't find an amount — please enter it.");
  else if (!numbersInText(text).includes(amount)) warnings.push("Double-check the amount; it wasn't written exactly like that.");

  let paidBy = matchMember(raw.payer, members);
  if (!paidBy) {
    paidBy = currentMember;
    if (raw.payer) warnings.push(`"${raw.payer}" isn't in this group, so the payer defaulted to you.`);
  }

When to use it

Use when

Use when building AI into an app or auditing an AI feature before it ships.

Skip it when

Skip it for a repo-wide AI cost and margin audit; ai-cost-audit owns that.

The thinking behind it

An AI feature is a product, not a prompt. Typed contracts, every UI state, evals and cost limits mean it holds up when real users hit it.

Output contract from the skill's Output section

Report the chosen interaction and why, server/UI paths changed, state coverage, safety and permission boundaries, evaluation results, latency/cost observations, usage-settlement behavior, verification evidence, and remaining provider or production setup.

How it checks its own work from the instructions

  • Mid-stream failure, cancellation, and timeout paths are tested
  • Tool actions tested against prompt injection and cross-tenant IDs
  • Execution-time authorization and usage settlement hold under concurrency
  • Evaluation set runs alongside lint, type, test, and build

Requirements what it needs

Works in
Codex, Claude Code, Cursor
Needs
project files, terminal commands, network access

The instructions SKILL.md · 36 lines

Instructions & references

Back to overview ↑
On this page 5 sections
SKILL.md · MIT

AI product development

Build an AI feature as a complete product path, not an isolated model call.

Workflow

  1. Define the user job, input, expected output, quality bar, acceptable latency, failure cost, privacy constraints, and the deterministic work that should remain ordinary software.
  2. Inspect the framework/runtime, AI SDK and version, providers, auth, storage, rate limits, billing, analytics, deployment limits, existing prompts, and evaluation fixtures.
  3. Choose the simplest fitting interaction: request/response, streamed generation, background job, retrieval, bounded tool use, or an agent loop. Ask only about unresolved product choices that change this boundary.
  4. Define a typed server contract. Validate input, authorize before model work, cap context/output/tool steps, keep provider secrets server-side, and isolate provider-specific code behind a replaceable adapter.
  5. Model the UI states the chosen interaction needs: initial, composing, submitted/queued, connecting, streaming or progress, tool approval/activity, partial result, cancellation, retry, refusal, rate limit, error, and completion.
  6. Design reliability before implementation: timeouts, retry policy, duplicate-submission keys, persistence, disconnect behavior, partial results, provider fallback, and cancellation. Treat model-selected tools and arguments as untrusted. For every consequential action, the server-side tool handler must re-authorize the current actor and tenant at execution time, validate the resource's current state and policy constraints, require explicit approval where appropriate, and apply idempotency immediately around the external mutation. An earlier request-level authorization is not sufficient.
  7. Treat usage charging as a reservation-and-settlement flow when concurrency or variable cost exists. Do not rely on a pre-check followed by post-hoc deduction.
  8. Add domain-appropriate trust controls: data minimization, prompt-injection boundaries, provenance, uncertainty, moderation/refusal behavior, tenant isolation, and audit logs for tool actions.
  9. Build an evaluation set from representative and adversarial tasks. Measure correctness, format adherence, refusal behavior, latency, and cost before changing models or prompts.
  10. Instrument provider/model, route, latency, usage units, cache status, retries, errors, user feedback, and task outcome without recording sensitive prompts or outputs by default.

Conditional guidance

  • Read streaming implementation only when implementing streamed chat or generation with the Vercel AI SDK. Detect the installed major version before using an API example.
  • Use the ai-cost-audit skill for repository-wide inventory and unit economics, but fetch current primary-source prices; do not copy embedded price tables without verification.

Verification

Test the happy path plus malformed input/output, slow first token, mid-stream failure, cancellation, disconnect, timeout, rate limit, duplicate submission, provider failure, and repeated concurrent requests. For tool actions, test prompt-injected arguments, cross-tenant resource IDs, state changes between proposal and execution, duplicate approval, provider retry, and policy-limit violations. Verify execution-time authorization and usage settlement under concurrency. Run the evaluation set and the repository’s lint/type/test/build commands in the target runtime.

Output

Report the chosen interaction and why, server/UI paths changed, state coverage, safety and permission boundaries, evaluation results, latency/cost observations, usage-settlement behavior, verification evidence, and remaining provider or production setup.

View on GitHub ↗
Claude app, ChatGPT and ZIP download

local coding agent required

This skill requires project files, terminal commands, and network access. Uploading it to a chat app does not provide equivalent execution.

ChatGPT Skills

This workflow needs a local coding environment or capabilities that a chat-only Skills upload does not provide.

Package details
Package
ai-product-development/SKILL.md
Author
@tushaarmehtaa
Added
7 Aug 2026
Tags
aistreamingagentsevaluationobservabilitysafety